If it is important to ensure that any particular part of the extended object does not fall on a CCD gap, users must choose the pointing direction appropriately (see UHB sections on EPIC pn chip array and EPIC MOS chip array ).
For each of MOS and pn, it must be decided if any part of the source is bright enough to give rise to local photon pile-up that would degrade the calibration beyond the science goals when using the full frame imaging mode (see UHB section on EPIC pile-up ). If not, the full frame mode should be used.
RGS data of faint extended sources are compromised by low total count numbers and a reduced energy resolution. It should be left on in the default SPECTROSCOPY mode for serendipitous background information (see UHB section on RGS modes ).
For a faint extended source the OM should be best operated in its imaging mode. It must be decided if a specific field of view coverage is needed or if the default OM sequence of 5 exposures per filter is adequate. If yes, a default configuration should be chosen (see § 3.3 and also the UHB sections on OM modes and OM default configurations ).
If the observation is long compared with the visibility window (as reported by the online XMM Target Visibility Tool), the user must consider how best to split it up, e.g., into multiple observations that fit into continuous visibility periods. Other criteria for the split of an observation could be optimal filling of gaps between CCDs, or a calculation to fit in a certain sequence of OM filters observed with one of the OM default configurations (i.e., with exposure multiples of five per filter).
Users must check the visible magnitude of in-field or nearby optical targets. If the soft X-ray response is important, one should choose the thinnest filter compatible with the brightest visible objects, as described in the UHB section on EPIC filters .
For standard SPECTROSCOPY mode observations with RGS no inputs are necessary to choose a non-default CCD readout sequence (see UHB section on RGS modes ).
For the OM it must be decided if specific filter coverage is necessary for the science or if the recommended filter sequence is adequate (see UHB section on OM default configurations and OM optical elements ).
While no limits are expected on the length of exposures for the X-ray instruments while observing faint sources (except for visibility constraints and the length of the observation), OM exposures are further constrained by telemetry and memory capacity limits (§ 5.3.3.5).