Known Issues
Source Detection
Sources within crowded fields are not included within the catalogue
Within the version 1.0 release of the catalogue, fields
containing >5,000 sources are not included. Source detection and
photometry are biased by poor background statistics and source
confusion in these dense fields. The absence of these fields is
particularly noticeable in the optical band samples which, relative
to the UV, are dominated by high Galactic latitude sources rather
than those in the direction of the Galactic plane or Magellanic
clouds. It is intended that more-crowded fields will be included
within future releases of the catalogue, once suitable detection and
photometry algorithms have been devised.
Astrometry
XMM-Newton pipeline products do not include astrometrically corrected images
This issue is not directly relevant to the contents of the
OM source catalogue. But catalogue users should note that while
source positions within the table have been astrometrically
corrected by ground processsing using correlations with USNO-B1.0 sources,
the images produced by the XMM pipeline are not corrected. Be
prepared therefore to find small (~ 1 arcsec) positional
offsets between sources contained in the images and
catalogue. Astrometric corrections to OM sky images will be added to
the pipeline at a future date.
Systematic offset between star trackers and USNO-B1.0
While stable over an observation, the absolute pointing
knowledge of the XMM spacecraft is good to a few arcsecs. A fine correction to the
pointing and source positions is made during the data reduction
pipeline. Statistically speaking the corrections in RA and Dec over
the duration of the mission are not completely random, with a bias of 0.3" in a
particular direction. The same offset is observed when comparing
USNO-B to Swift-UVOT fields and USNO-B to SDSS fields (Scott Koch;
private communication). Users should be aware that the XMM-OM
sources are corrected RELATIVE to the USNO-B catalogue.
Photometry
- Sources are not extracted from the deepest possible images
While the positions of all sources within the catalogue have
been corrected using the USNO-B1.0 survey as reference, the images
are not subsequently corrected using the RA and Dec offsets
determined during the correction. Therefore historically the XMM-OM
images have not been mosaiced in order produce the deepest possible
image data. As of SAS8.0 sky images are aspect corrected and because
of this improvement in data quality, the next version of the
catalogue will extend the faint source limit significantly
deeper.
- Lower limits for non-detections are not provided
Currently, sources with non-detections in certain filters
are given a detection significance of -999σ. While this does
provide a useful selection diagnostic, it would be more useful to
provide the specific background limit for each non-detection. The
functionality to perform aperture photometry over the positions of
these non-detected sources is not currently used within the
pipeline, but is a desirable feature for future versions.
- Accuracy of coincidence loss in extended sources is unquantified
Count rates are under-estimated in bright sources because of
photon coincidence
loss. These are corrected for during the data reduction
pipeline. Using photometric standards the effect has been
well-calibrated in point sources, but the calibration has not been
tested upon bright extended sources. Events from an extended source
will have a different positional distribution compared to point
source. When combined with the modulo-8 fixed pattern, the
coincidence correction of extended sources will come with an
unquantified systematic error.
- Magnitudes per unit area of extended sources are not reported in the catalogue
Reported magnitudes are integrated over extraction apertures
and the aperture sizes are not recorded in the catalogue; for point
sources these are either 17.5" radius circles (UVW2, UVM2, UVW1) or
6.0" radius circles (U, B, V). For extended sources it is not
possible to accurately convert magnitudes to magnitudes per unit sky
area. This can be done in an approximate way however using the major
and minor axis Full-Width Half-Maximums recorded in the
FILTER_MAJOR_AXIS and FILTER_MINOR_AXIS catalogue
columns.
Extended Sources
- Bias of unknown origin in size of extended
sources
The size and morphology of a source on the sky is
represented by a 2-dimensional Guassian, calculated from
moments. The FWHM of the minor axis, FWHM of the major axis and
orientation of the axes are recorded in the catalogue. From the distribution of the position angle of the source
|